REMEIED: Memorias del Encuentro Internacional de Educación a Distancia

Discourse in the development of identities in an online teacher education programme

Daisy Giles

Resumen


This research aims to develop understanding into how learners use discourse devices to portray identities in virtual learning environments (VLEs) and how this can contribute to their learning.  Learning occurs through meaningful interactions with others, and social presence is seen as crucial for effective learning in VLEs (Garrison, Anderson & Archer, 2000).  VLEs provide unique affordances and challenges in relation to the presentation of self, largely due to the lack of physical embodiment (Gee, 2003; Dall’Alba & Barnacle, 2005).  Discourse has a central role in the projection of identities (Burgess & Ivanič, 2010; Gee, 2000), meaning it is essential that learners develop discourse skills in order to interact effectively in VLEs.  Focusing on an online teacher-education programme, this study adopts several discourse analysis approaches to explore discursive devices used by learners. The analysis of forum discussions and narrative interviews identified three main categories of identities:  student, teacher and other. While the development of teacher identities is the ultimate goal of the programme, student identities showed to be central to learning, with the discourse they were built on creating a sense of community.  Task instructions were found to be crucial in determining the identities portrayed, providing useful insights for educators working within VLEs.



Palabras clave


identity; discourse; online; learning

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


Bauer, M. (1996). The narrative interview: Comments on a technique for qualitative data collection. London School of Economics and Political Science Methodology Institute. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/methodology/pdf/QualPapers/Bauer-NARRAT1SS.pdf

Bayne, S. (2004). The embodiment of the online learner. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference ( 105-115). Perth, 5-8 December. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/bayne.html

Bullingham, L. & Vasconcelos, A.C. (2013). 'The presentation of self in the online world': Goffman and the study of online identities. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 101-112.

Burgess, A. & Ivanič, R. (2010). Writing and being written: Issues of identity across timescales. Written Communication, 27(2), 228-255.

Dall’Alba, G. & Barnacle, R. (2005). Embodied Knowing in Online Environments. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(5), 719-744.

Delahunty, J. (2012). ‘Who am I?’: Exploring identity in online discussion forums. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 407-420.

Dey, I. (1993). Quantitative Data Analysis: a user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.

Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.

Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 5-9.

Gee, J. (2000). Identity and an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99-125.

Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Gordonsville, VA, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gee, J. (2011a). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed). New York: Routledge.

Gee, J. (2011b). How to do Discourse Analysis: A toolkit. New York: Routledge.

Goertzen, & Kristjánsson, C. (2007). Interpersonal dimensions of community in graduate online learning: Exploring social presence through the lens of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 212–230.

Hughes, G. & Scott, C. (2005). No Pain, No Gain: use of an online game to explore issues of online identity and the implications for collaborative e-learning. E–Learning, 2 (4), 388-401. doi: 10.2304/elea.2005.2.4.388

Hidalgo-Downing, L. & Núñez-Perucha, B. (2013). Modality and personal pronouns as indexical markers of stance: Intersubjective positioning and construction of public identity in media interviews. In Marin-Arrese, J.I., Carretero, M., Arús-Hita, J. & Van Der Auwera, J. (Eds.) English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality (379-410). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.

Irwin, B. & Hramiak, A. (2010). A discourse analysis of trainee teacher identity in online discussion forums. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(3), 361-377.

Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: the discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, B.V.

Izadinia, M. (2013). A review of research on student teachers’ professional identity. British Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 694–713.

Kanno, Y. & Stuart, C. (2011). Learning to become a second-language teacher: Identities-in-practice. The Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 236-252.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lomicka, L. & Lord, G. (2007). Social presence in virtual communities of foreign language (FL) teachers. System, 35, 208–228.

Moss, T. & Pittaway, S. (2013). Student identity construction in online teacher education: a narrative life history approach. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(8), 1004-1018.

Sutherland, L., Howard, S. & Markauskaite, L. (2010). Professional identity creation: Examining the development of beginning preservice teachers’ understanding of their work as teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 455-465.

Swales, J.M. & Feak, C. (2000). English in Today's Research World: A Writing Guide. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.

Timostsuk, I. & Ugaste, A. (2010). Student teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1563-570.

Torrance, H. (2012). Research Triangulation, Respondent Validation, and Democratic Participation in Mixed Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 111-123.

Woo, Y. & Reeves, T.C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 15–25.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.