Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico 
Ocultar
Mostrar todos
Más allá de la apropiación humanista: agencia y co-construcción de los adultos mayores frente a las tecnologías digitales
Resumen
Este ensayo crítico busca contribuir a la discusión emergente en América Latina sobre la relación entre el envejecimiento y las tecnologías digitales. Para ello, parte de la problematización de ideas deterministas sobre la apropiación de la tecnología por parte de los adultos mayores y su inclusión digital. Se discute la postura de este grupo frente a la tecnología y se contrasta esta posición humanista con enfoques posthumanistas del llamado “giro material”, los cuales han considerado la co-construcción o constitución mutua entre adultos mayores y la tecnología, y argumentan en contra de ontologías esencialistas. Se sostiene que el envejecimiento es un proceso que sucede de manera conjunta a distintos artefactos, así como a discursos, políticas, normas, entre otros aspectos. De esta manera, se propone que el estudio sobre la relación entre adultos mayores y tecnologías digitales vaya más allá de la discusión sobre distintas formas de apropiación y se enfoque en su co-construcción.
Palabras clave
Referencias
Abbey, R. y Hyde, S. (2009). No country for older people? Age and the digital divide. Journal of information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 7(4), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/14779960911004480
Aibar, E. (1996). La vida social de las máquinas: orígenes, desarrollo y perspectivas actuales en la sociología de la tecnología. Reis, 76, 141-170.
Andrews, G. y Duff, C. (2019a). Understanding the vital emergence and expression of aging: How matter comes to matter in gerontology's posthumanist turn. Journal of aging studies, 49, 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2019.04.002
Andrews, G. y Duff, C. (2019b). Matter beginning to matter: On posthumanist understandings of the vital emergence of health. Social Science & Medicine, 226, 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.045
Baars, J. (1997). Concepts of time and narrative, temporality in the study of aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 11(4), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065(97)90023-2
Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. Londres: Sage.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham y Londres: Duke university Press.
Battersby, L.; Canham, S.; Lan Fang, M.; Sixsmith, J. y Sixsmith, A. (2016). Middle Aged and Older Adults Information and Communication Technology Access: A Realist Review. Reporte Final de SSHRC Knowledge Synthesis Grant, Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University. Recuperado de: https://www.sfu.ca/content/dam/sfu/grc/grcdocsgeneral/SSHRC%20KS%20Digital%20Divide%20Final%20Report.Oct.24.pdf
Baumer, E.; Morgan, G.; M. Burrell, J.; Brubaker, J. R. y Dourish, P. (2015). Why study technology non-use? First Monday, 20, 11. Recuperado de: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/6310/5137
Blaschke, C. M.; Freddolino, P. P. y Mullen, E. E. (2009). Ageing and technology: A review of the research literature. British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 641-656. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp025
Bosch, T. y Currin, B. (2015). Usos y gratificaciones de los ordenadores en personas mayores en Sudáfrica. Comunicar, 23(45), 9-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C45-2015-01
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, Reino Unido; Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle, en M. Callon, J. Law, y A. Rip (eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology – Sociology of Science in the Real World. Basingstoke: Sheridan House.
Casamayou, A. (2016). Apropiación(es). Aportes desde la sistematización y la teoría, en Rivoir A. (Ed.), Tecnologías digitales en sociedad: análisis empíricos y reflexiones teóricas (pp. 15-21). Montevideo: Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Departamento de Sociología.
Casamayou, A. y Morales, M. J. (2017). Personas mayores y tecnologías digitales: desafíos de un binomio. Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad, 7(2), 152-172. Recuperado de: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=475855161009
Castleton, A. (2019). Ageing and Technology: the case of a one-tablet-per-senior program in Uruguay (Tesis doctoral). Carleton University: Ottawa, Canadá.
Caspi, A.; Daniel, M. & Kavé, G. (2019). Technology makes older adults feel older. Aging & mental health, 23(8), 1025-1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1479834
CBC News. (31 de julio de 2019). Siri with sensitivity: Emotionally intelligent chatbot could ease elder loneliness. Recuperado de: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/university-of-alberta-emotional-intelligence-chatbot-osmar-zaiane-1.5231747
Colombo, F.; Aroldi, P. y Carlo, S. (2015). Nuevos mayores, viejas brechas: TIC, desigualdad y bienestar en la tercera edad en Italia. Comunicar, 23(45), 47-56. Recuperado de: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=15839609005
Cotten, S. R.; Anderson, W. A. & McCullough, B. M. (2013). Impact of internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: cross-sectional analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 15(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2306
Crow, B. y Sawchuk, K. (2014). Ageing mobile media, en G. Goggin y L. Hjorth (Eds.), The Routledge companion to mobile media (pp. 303-314). Londres: Routledge.
Czaja, S. J. (2017). The role of technology in supporting social engagement among older adults. Public Policy & Aging Report, 27(4), 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/prx034
Czaja, S. J.; Guerrier, J. H.; Nair, S. N. y Landauer, T. K. (1993). Computer communication as an aid to independence for older adults. Behaviour & Information Technology, 12(4), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449299308924382
Dickinson, A. y Gregor, P. (2006). Computer use has no demonstrated impact on the well-being of older adults. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 744-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.03.001
Emirbayer, M. y Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American journal of sociology, 103(4), 962-1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Etzioni, A. (2020). The Sociology of Surviving the Coronavirus. The National Interest. Recuperado de: https://nationalinterest.org/feature/sociology-surviving-coronavirus-133512
Farris, M.; Bates, R.; Resnick, H. & Stabler, N. (1995). Evaluation of computer games' impact upon cognitively impaired frail elderly. Computers in Human Services, 11(1-2), 219-228.
Fernández-Ardèvol, M.; Sawchuk, K. y Grenier, L. (2017). Maintaining Connections: Octo- and Nonagenarians on Digital ‘Use and Non-use’. Nordicom Review, 38(s1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0396
Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Rosales, A., Loos, E., Peine, A., Beneito-Montagut, R., Blanche, D., Fischer, B., Katz, & Östlund, B. (2019, July). Methodological strategies to understand smartphone practices for social connectedness in later life, en: J. Zhou and G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Social Media, Games and Assistive Environments. 5th International Conference, ITAP 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL, USA, 26-31 July 2019, Proceedings, Part II (pp. 46-64). Springer, Cham. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22015-0_4.
Frankel, L. y Bisson, D. (2008). Old Age: What Designers Can Learn from the Literature. Recuperado de: http://www.idsa.org/sites/default/files/Old_Age.pdf
Friemel, T. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648
Gagliardi, C.; Mazzarini, G.; Papa, R.; Giuli, C. y Marcellini, F. (2007). Designing a learning program to link old and disabled people to computers. Educational Gerontology, 34(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270701763902
Gertz, N. (3 de junio de 2018). Questioning the “Normal”: Technology, Progress, and Human Life. Sicheheits politik-blog. Recuperado de: https://www.sicherheitspolitik-blog.de/2018/06/03/questioning-the-normal-technology-progress-and-human-life/
Giaccardi, E.; Kuijer, L. y Neven, L. (2016). Design for resourceful ageing: Intervening in the ethics of gerontechnology. Presentado en 2016 Design Research Society Conference (DRS 2016), June 27-30, 2016. Brighton, UK.
Gil González, S. y Rodríguez-Porrero, C. (2015). Tecnología y personas mayores. CEAPAT. Recuperado de: http://www.ceapat.es/InterPresent1/groups/imserso/documents/binario/reto_8.pdf
Gilleard, C. y Higgs, P. (1998). Old people as users and consumers of healthcare: a third age rhetoric for a fourth age reality? Ageing & Society, 18(2), 233-248. Recuperado de: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/73546/
Gómez, D. L. (2015). Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life. Technological forecasting and social change, 93, 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.015
González, A.; Ramírez, M. P. y Viadel, V. (2012). Attitudes of the elderly toward information and communications technologies. Educational Gerontology, 38(9), 585-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2011.595314
Hakkarainen, P. (2012). ‘No good for shovelling snow and carrying firewood’: Social representations of computers and the internet by elderly Finnish non-users. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1198-1215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812442663
Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century, en D. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). New York: Routledge.
Helsper, E. y Reisdorf, B. (2013). A quantitative examination of explanations for reasons for internet non use. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 16(2), 94-99. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0257
Higgs, P., y Gilleard, C. (2014). Frailty, abjection and the ‘othering’ of the fourth age. Health Sociology Review, 23(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2014.23.1.10
Höppner, G. y Urban, M. (2018). Where and how do aging processes take place in everyday life? Answers from a new materialist perspective. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00007
Hunsaker, A. y Hargittai, E. (2018). A review of Internet use among older adults. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3937-3954. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818787348
Johnson, J. M. y Kotarba, J. A. (2002). Postmodern existentialism, en J. A. Kotarba & J. M. Johnson (Eds.), Postmodern existential sociology (pp. 3-14). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
Joyce, K. y Loe, M. (2010). A sociological approach to ageing, technology and health. Sociology of health & illness, 32(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01219.x
Joyce, K.; Loe, M. y Diamond-Brown, L. (2015). Science, technology and aging, en Routledge handbook of cultural gerontology (pp. 157–65). London and New York: Routledge.
Joyce, K.; Peine, A.; Neven, L. y Kohlbacher, F. (2017). Aging: The socio-material constitution of later life, en The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 915-942). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
Jyrkämä, J. (2008). Toimijuus, ikääntyminen ja arkielämä: hahmottelua teoreettis-metodologiseksi viitekehykseksi. Gerontologia, 22(2008), 4. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:ELE-1405542
Kania-Lundholm, M. (2019). Slow Side of the Divide? Digital Culture & Society, 5(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2019-0106
Karavidas, M.; Lim, N. K. y Katsikas, S. L. (2005). The effects of computers on older adult users. Computers in human behavior, 21(5), 697-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.012
Kim, Y. S. (2008). Reviewing and critiquing computer learning and usage among older adults. Educational Gerontology, 34(8), 709-735. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270802000576
Knowles, B. H. y Hanson, V. L. (2018). The Wisdom of Older Technology (Non-) Users. Communications of the ACM, 61(3), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3179995
König, R. y Seifert, A. (2020). From Online to Offline and Vice Versa: Change in Internet Use in Later Life across Europe. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00004
Kotarba, J. A. y Fontana, A. (Eds.). (1987). The existential self in society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuijer, L., Nicenboim, I. y Giaccardi, E. (2017). Conceptualising resourcefulness as a dispersed practice, en Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 15-27). ACM.
Lassen, A. J. (2017). Shaping old age: Innovation partnerships, senior centres and billiards tables as active ageing technologies, en I. Loffeier; B. Majerus & T. Moulaert (Eds.), Framing Age: Contested Knowledge in Science and Politics (pp. 222-236). Londres: Routledge.
Lassen, A. J. y Moreira, T. (2014). Unmaking old age: Political and cognitive formats of active ageing. Journal of Aging Studies, 30, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.03.004
Larsson, Å. (2009). Everyday life amongst the oldest old: descriptions of doings and possession and use of technology (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad de Linköping, Linköping, Suecia.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford university Press.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge: New York.
Lipponen, L. (2007). Yleisestä mediaosaamisesta paikalliseen ja yhteisölliseen mediaosaamiseen, en H. Kynäslahti; R. Kupiainen & M. Lehtonen (Eds.), Näkökulmia mediakasvatukseen (pp. 51–60). Mediakasvatusseuran julkaisuja 1/2007. Recuperado de: http://www.mediakasvatus.fi/publications/ISBN978-952-99964-1-4.pdf
Loe, M. (2010). Doing it my way: old women, technology and wellbeing. Sociology of health & illness, 32(2), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01220.x
Marston, H. R.; Genoe, R.; Freeman, S.; Kulczycki, C. y Musselwhite, C. (2019). Older adults’ perceptions of ICT: Main findings from the Technology in Later Life (TILL) study. Healthcare, 7(3), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7030086
Mead, G. y Neves, B. B. (2018). Recursive approaches to technology adoption, families, and the life course: Actor-network theory and strong-structuration theory, en B. B. Neves & C. Casimiro (Eds.), Connecting families? Information & communication technologies, generations, and the life course. Londres: Policy Press.
Millward, P. (2003). The 'grey digital divide': Perception, exclusion and barriers of access to the Internet for older people. First Monday, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v8i7.1066
Morales, S. (2018). La apropiación de tecnologías. Ideas para un paradigma en construcción, en S. Lago Martínez; A. Álvarez; M. Gendler & A. Méndez (Eds.), Acerca de la apropiación de tecnologías: teoría, estudios y debates. Buenos Aires: Ediciones del gato gris.
Morales, M. J. y Rivoir, A. (2018). Personas mayores y tecnologías digitales: Uso y apropiaciones de tabletas en personas mayores en Uruguay, en S. Lago Martínez; A. Álvarez; M. Gendler y A. Méndez (Eds.), Acerca de la Apropiación de Tecnologías: teoría, estudios y debates (pp. 113-120). Buenos Aires: Ediciones del gato gris.
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: the folly of technological solutionism (First edition.). Public Affairs.
Neven, L. (2010). ‘But obviously not for me’: robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociology of health & illness, 32(2), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.x
Neven, L. (2015). By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people's wish to live at home. Technological forecasting and social change, 93, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.016
Neven, L. y Peine, A. (2017). From triple win to triple sin: How a problematic future discourse is shaping the way people age with technology. Societies, 7(3), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7030026
Neves, B. B. y Amaro, F. (2012). Too old for technology? How the elderly of Lisbon use and perceive ICT. The journal of community informatics, 8(1), 1-12. Recuperado en: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.956.624&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Nussbaum, M. y Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon.
Olsson, T.; Samuelsson, U. y Viscovi, D. (2019). At risk of exclusion? Degrees of ICT access and literacy among senior citizens. Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1355007
Östlund, B. (2004). Social Science Research on Technology and the Elderly - Does It Exist? Science Studies, 17(2), 44-62.
Östlund, B.; Olander, E.; Jonsson, O. y Frennert, S. (2015). STS-inspired design to meet the challenges of modern aging. Welfare technology as a tool to promote user driven innovations or another way to keep older users hostage? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.012
Oudshoorn, N.; Neven, L. y Stienstra, M. (2016). How diversity gets lost: Age and gender in design practices of information and communication technologies. Journal of Women & Aging, 28(2), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2015.1013834
Peek, S. (2017). Understanding technology acceptance by older adults who are aging in place: A dynamic perspective (Tesis Doctoral). University of Tilburg, Tilburg, Países Bajos.
Peine, A.; Rollwagen, I. y Neven, L. (2014). The rise of the “innosumer”-rethinking older technology users. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.06.013
Peine, A.; Faulkner, A.; Jæger, B. y Moors, E. (2015). Science, technology and the ‘grand challenge’ of ageing—Understanding the socio-material constitution of later life. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 93, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.010
Peine, A. (2019). Technology and Ageing-Theoretical Propositions from Science and Technology Studies (STS), en B. B. Neves y F. Vetere (Eds.), Ageing and Digital Technology (pp. 51-64). Singapur: Springer.
Peine, A. y Neven, L. (2018). From intervention to co-constitution: new directions in theorizing about aging and technology. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny050
Quan-Haase, A.; Martin, K. y Schreurs, K. (2016). Interviews with digital seniors: ICT use in the context of everyday life. Information, Communication & Society, 19(5), 691-707. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1140217
Rasi, P. y Kilpeläinen, A. (2015). The digital competences and agency of older people living in rural villages in Finnish Lapland. Seminar.net, 11(2), 149-160.
Richardson, M.; Zorn, T. E. y Weaver, K. (2011). Older People and New Communication Technologies Narratives from the Literature. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35(1), 121-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2011.11679114
Rosales, A. y Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2019). Smartphone Usage Diversity among Older People, en S. Sayago (Ed.), Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction Research with Older People (pp. 51-66). Singapore: Springer.
Russell, H. (2011). Later life ICT learners ageing well. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 6(2), 103-127. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.1162103
Sallinen, M.; Hentonen, O. y Kärki, A. (2015). Technology and active agency of older adults living in service house environment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10(1), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.836685
Schlomann, A.; Seifert, A.; Zank, S.; Woopen, C. y Rietz, C. (2020). Use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Devices Among the Oldest-Old: Loneliness, Anomie, and Autonomy. Innovation in Aging, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz050
Seifert, A. y Schelling, H. R. (2016). Seniors online: Attitudes toward the internet and coping with everyday life. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464816669805
Seifert, A.; Kamin, S. T. y Lang, F. R. (2020). Technology Adaptivity Mediates the Effect of Technology Biography on Internet Use Variability. Innovation in Aging, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz054
Selwyn, N. (2006). Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-users of computers. Poetics, 34(4-5), 273-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.003
Selwyn, N.; Gorard, S.; Furlong, J. y Madden, L. (2003). Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing & Society, 23(5), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X03001302
Shapira, N.; Barak, A. y Gal, I. (2007). Promoting older adults' well-being through internet training and use. Aging & Mental Health, 11(5), 477-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860601086546
Sixsmith, A. (2013). Technology and the challenge of aging, en A. Sixsmith y G. Gutman (Eds.), Technologies for Active Aging (pp. 7-25). New York: Springer.
Sixsmith, A. y Gutman, G. (Eds.). (2013). Technologies for Active Aging. New York: Springer.
Suopajärvi, T. (2015). Past experiences, current practices and future design: Ethnographic study of aging adults' everyday ICT practices—And how it could benefit public ubiquitous computing design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93: 112-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.006
Toczyski, P.; Kowalski, J. y Biele, C. (2019). Proxy users enable older people creative writing on the Web. Frontiers in Sociology, 4, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00015
Twigg, J. (2013). Fashion and age: Dress, the body and later life. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
van Deursen A. y van Dijk J. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 13(6), 893-911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774
Wanka, A. y Gallistl, V. (2018). Doing Age in a Digitized World-A Material Praxeology of Aging with Technology. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00006
Weisman, S. (1983). Computer games for the frail elderly. The Gerontologist, 23(4), 361-363. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/23.4.361
White, H.; McConnell, E.; Clipp, E.; Bynum, L.; Teague, C.; Navas, L.; Craven, S. y Halbrecht, H. (1999). Surfing the Net in Later Life: A Review of the Literature and Pilot Study of Computer Use and Quality of Life. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 18(3), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/073346489901800306
White, J. y Weatherall, A. (2000). A grounded theory analysis of older adults and information technology. Educational Gerontology, 26:4, 371-386, https://doi.org/10.1080/036012700407857
Winstead, V., Anderson, W. A., Yost, E. A., Cotten, S. R., Warr, A. y Berkowsky, R. W. (2013). You can teach an old dog new tricks: A qualitative analysis of how residents of senior living communities may use the web to overcome spatial and social barriers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 32(5), 540-560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464811431824
Wyatt, S. (2003). Non-users also matter: The construction of users and non-users of the Internet, en N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology (pp. 67-79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wyatt, S. (2014). Bringing users and non-users into being across methods and disciplines, en Refusing, Limiting, Departing: CHI 2014 Workshop Considering Why We Should Study Technology Non-use, Toronto. Recuperado de: http://nonuse.jedbrubaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Wyatt_Toronto_April_2014.pdf
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32870/Pk.a10n19.467
PAAKAT: Revista de Tecnología y Sociedad, año 14, número 26, marzo - agosto de 2024, es una publicación electrónica semestral editada por la Universidad de Guadalajara, a través de la Coordinación de Recursos Informativos del Sistema de Universidad Virtual. Av. La Paz 2453, Col. Arcos Sur, CP 44140, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. Tels. 33 32 68 88 88 y 33 31 34 22 22, ext. 18775. Dirección electrónica: http://www.udgvirtual.udg.mx/paakat/index.php/paakat. Correo electrónico: paakat@udgvirtual.udg.mx. Editor responsable: Dr. Lázaro Marcos Chávez Aceves. Número de Reserva de Derechos al Uso Exclusivo del Título de la versión electrónica: 04-2011-111117155600-203, e-ISSN: 2007-3607, otorgados por el Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor. Responsable de la última actualización de este número: Sistema de Universidad Virtual, José Antonio Amaro López. Fecha de la última modificación: 29 de febrero de 2024.
Las opiniones expresadas por los autores no necesariamente reflejan la postura del editor de la publicación.
Esta obra está bajo Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
